“My research shows that sniffling can be a way for a speaker to indicate a shift from personal to professional opinions and vice versa. I have called this ‘the emotional sniff’ as personal statements are allowed to be more emotional. This emotional sniffling is also used when making statements that may be deemed inappropriate for a professional role”, says Lisa Flower.
In the scientific article “The (Un)emotional Law Student” Lisa Flower discusses the concept of “the emotional sniff”. Her research is based on observations and interviews with law students who, in their role as future lawyers, must learn various strategies for dealing with personal feelings. According to Lisa Flower’s observations, sniffling was an unconscious way for law students to indicate the shift between personal and professional statements.
So, in Donald Trump’s case, how would you interpret the sniffling?
“I noted that Trump sniffled more often when questions about Mexico and Mexican immigration came up. One might interpret these questions as more personal to him”, says Lisa Flower.
Lisa Flower’s article “The (Un)emotional Law Student” is the second-most downloaded article from Lund University this year, and was downloaded nearly 700 times during the days that followed the presidential debate.