The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Om mänskliga beslutsprocesser: Beslutskonflikt, en fråga om värderingar

Author

Summary, in English

How we initially formulate our decision problems may have a strong influence on our decisions and we often take the presented problems and alternatives for granted. When facing difficult decisions it is important to consider things as: ”am I considering the right decision”, ”are there other decisions with other alternatives that are more relevant”, etc. Also when considering a previously made decision, the decision maker ought to question the reasons behind her/his post decision evaluations. In this article decision making is modeled as a process where one decision alternative gradually become differentiated from other alternatives to a degree that makes a decision possible. However, the decision processes do not stop with the decision. The pre-decision phase is followed by a post decision phase characterized by forces working in favor of the previously chosen alternative. Themes with importance for practical decision-making such as selection of alternatives, evaluations, and decision conflicts, are discussed in the article.

Publishing year

2003

Language

Swedish

Pages

26-31

Publication/Series

Nucleus: forskningsnytt från Statens kärnkraftinspektion

Volume

1

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Statens kärnkraftinspektion (SKI)

Topic

  • Psychology

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1104-4578