The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Five-factor inventories have a major higher order factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally

På svenska

Author

Summary, in English

The factors in self-report inventories measuring the five-factor model (FFM) correlate with one another although they theoretically should not. Study 1 showed, across three different FFM-questionnaires, that almost all of the common variance between factors can be attributed to a single general factor related to social desirability. In Study 2, simple rephrasing of items from a FFM-questionnaire made them substantially less socially desirable, while the inventory’s empirical (five factor) structure remained the same. Participants low in social desirability showed little difference between how they responded to the original items vs. the neutral items. For participants high in social desirability the difference was considerably larger. The simplicity of reducing social desirability in self-rating inventories of the FFM, and the usefulness of this endeavor, is discussed.

Publishing year

2009

Language

English

Pages

335-344

Publication/Series

Journal of Research in Personality

Volume

43

Issue

3

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Psychology

Keywords

  • Factor analysis
  • Big Five
  • Social desirability
  • Personality

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0092-6566