The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

The Strike of the Demon: On Fitting Pro-attitudes

Author

Summary, in English

According to an influential tradition in value analysis, to be valuable is

to be a fitting object of a pro-attitude. If it is fitting to favor an object

for its own sake, then, on this view, the object has final value, that is, it

is valuable for its own sake. If it is fitting to have a pro-attitude toward

an object for the sake of its effects, then its value is instrumental. And

so on. Disvalue is connected in an analogous way to contra-attitudes

instead.

Apart from the linkage between value and attitudes, what is distinctive

for this kind of analysis, at least on some of its readings, is that

it establishes a connection between the axiological and the deontic

notions: value on this approach is explicated in terms of the stance that

should be taken toward the object. That it is fitting to have a certain

attitude, that there are reasons to have it, or that the attitude in question

is appropriate or called for, are different ways to express this deontic

claim. Consequently, an important advantage of the “fitting-attitudes”

analysis, or the FA analysis for short, is that it removes the air of mystery

from the normative ‘compellingness’ of values.

Publishing year

2004

Language

English

Pages

391-423

Publication/Series

Ethics

Volume

114

Issue

3

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

University of Chicago Press

Topic

  • Philosophy

Keywords

  • Conflation-problem Justin D'Arms Daniel Jacobson

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1539-297X