The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Individual differences in processing styles: validity of the Rational-Experiential Inventory.

På svenska

Author

Summary, in English

In Study 1 (N= 203) the factor structure of a Swedish translation of Pacini and Epstein's Rational-Experiential Inventory (REI-40) was investigated using confirmatory factor analysis. The hypothesized model with rationality and experientiality as orthogonal factors had satisfactory fit to the data, significantly better than alternative models (with two correlated factors or a single factor). Inclusion of "ability" and "favorability" subscales for rationality and experientiality increased fit further. It was concluded that the structural validity of the REI is adequate. In Study 2 (N= 72) the REI-factors were shown to have theoretically meaningful correlations to other personality traits, indicating convergent and discriminant validity. Finally, scores on the rationality scale were negatively related to risky choice framing effects in Kahneman and Tversky's Asian disease task, indicating concurrent validity. On the basis of these findings it was concluded that the test has satisfactory psychometric properties.

Publishing year

2008

Language

English

Pages

439-446

Publication/Series

Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Volume

49

Issue

5

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Topic

  • Psychology

Keywords

  • intuition
  • Reasoning
  • individual differences
  • test
  • validity

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1467-9450