The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

The Pernicious Effects of Contaminated Data in Risk Management

Author

Summary, in English

Banks hold capital to guard against unexpected surges in losses and long freezes in financial markets. The minimum level of capital is set by banking regulators as a function of the banks’ own estimates of their risk exposures. As a result, a great challenge for both banks and regulators is to validate internal risk models. We show that a large fraction of US and international banks uses contaminated data when testing their models. In particular, most banks validate their market risk model using profit-and-loss (P/L) data that include fees and commissions and intraday trading revenues. This practice is inconsistent with the definition of the employed market risk measure. Using both bank data and simulations, we find that data contamination has dramatic implications for model validation and can lead to the acceptance of misspecified risk models. Moreover, our estimates suggest that the use of contaminated data can significantly reduce (market-risk induced) regulatory capital.

Publishing year

2011

Language

English

Pages

2569-2583

Publication/Series

Journal of Banking & Finance

Volume

35

Issue

10

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Business Administration
  • Economics

Keywords

  • proprietary trading
  • Regulatory capital
  • backtesting
  • value-at-risk
  • profit-and-loss

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1872-6372