The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Comparability of self-reported conscientiousness across 21 countries

Author

  • René Mõttus
  • Jüri Allik
  • Anu Realo
  • Helle Pullman
  • Jérôme Rossier
  • Gregory Zecca
  • Jennifer Ah-Kion
  • Dénis Amoussou-Yéyé
  • Martin Bäckström
  • Rasa Barkauskiene
  • Oumar Barry
  • Uma Bhowon
  • Fredrik Björklund
  • Alexandra Bochaver
  • Konstantin Bochaver
  • Gideon P. de Bruin
  • Helena F. Cabrera
  • Sylvia Xiaohua Chen
  • Timothy A. Church
  • Daouda Dougoumalé Cissé
  • Donatien Dahourou
  • Xiaohang Feng
  • Yanjun Guan
  • Hyi-Sung Hwang
  • Fazilah Idris
  • Marcia S. Katigbak
  • Peter Kuppens
  • Anna Kwiatkowska
  • Alfredas Laurinavicius
  • Khairul Anwar Mastor
  • David Matsumoto
  • Rainer Reimann
  • Joanna Schug
  • Brian Simpson
  • Caroline Ng Tseung

Summary, in English

In cross-national studies, mean levels of self-reported phenomena are often not congruent with more objective criteria. One prominent explanation for such findings is that people make self-report judgements in relation to culture-specific standards (often called the reference group effect), thereby undermining the cross-cultural comparability of the judgements. We employed a simple method called anchoring vignettes in order to test whether people from 21 different countries have varying standards for Conscientiousness, a Big Five personality trait that has repeatedly shown unexpected nation-level relationships with external criteria. Participants rated their own Conscientiousness and that of 30 hypothetical persons portrayed in short vignettes. The latter type of ratings was expected to reveal individual differences in standards of Conscientiousness. The vignettes were rated relatively similarly in all countries, suggesting no substantial culture-related differences in standards for Conscientiousness. Controlling for the small differences in standards did not substantially change the rankings of countries on mean self-ratings or the predictive validities of these rankings for objective criteria. These findings are not consistent with mean self-rated Conscientiousness scores being influenced by culture-specific standards. The technique of anchoring vignettes can be used in various types of studies to assess the potentially confounding effects of reference levels.

Publishing year

2012

Language

English

Pages

303-317

Publication/Series

European Journal of Personality

Volume

26

Issue

3

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Topic

  • Psychology

Keywords

  • anchoring vignettes
  • reference group effect
  • DIF
  • cross-cultural
  • aggregate personality scores

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1099-0984