The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Was there a family gap in late nineteenth century manufacturing? Evidence from Sweden

På svenska

Author

Summary, in English

While women today often face a substantial wage penalty for childbearing, we show that this was not always the case, making use of a rich material of matched employer-employee data covering the Swedish tobacco industry in 1898 in its entirety. Although working conditions were dire, and hours long, women working in the late nineteenth-century manufacturing industry faced no motherhood penalty. Compared to other women, mothers worked slightly less but earned higher (six per cent) hourly wages. Experience increased women's wages but firm tenure did not, and women were not penalized for career interruptions or changes of employer. The wage premium, however, occurred only among women working on piece rates, and not among women working for time rate wages. Apparently, it was related to effort; mothers on piece rates could increase their work effort in order to provide more income for their dependent children.

Publishing year

2012

Language

English

Pages

31-50

Publication/Series

The History of the Family

Volume

17

Issue

1

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Topic

  • Economic History

Keywords

  • gender
  • earnings
  • labour market
  • motherhood
  • piece rates
  • family gap
  • late nineteenth century
  • women's wages

Status

Published

Project

  • Lön efter möda eller lön efter kön? Om betydelsen av produktivitet, konkurrens och kontrakt för lönediskriminering

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1873-5398