The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Metaphors and their Making: Bodily, conventionally and contextually motivated metaphors in inter- and intra-generational conversations

Author

  • Björn Torstensson

Summary, in Swedish

This thesis examines and compares spontaneous metaphor usage in conversations within and between generations. It investigates to what extent they can be seen as motivated by bodily, conventional and situated factors with the help of the Motivation and Sedimentation Model (MSM), which operates with these three levels of meaning. The model combines and integrates earlier accounts of metaphor motivation, conventionalization and emergence, as shown through a theoretical discussion.
The thesis proposes and employs a detailed MSM-based procedure for linguistic metaphor identification in transcripts from moderated dyadic conversations between participants, thus contributing to MSM specifically with both methodology and new data. The identification procedure was based on the Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIP), elaborated through elements from the Discourse Dynamics Approach (DDA). It was further aided by MSM’s definition of metaphor based on the notions of iconicity and semantic tension, the latter understood in the present context as polysemy (as opposed to semantic vagueness/generality).
Rather surprisingly, the analysis showed no major quantitative differences in metaphor motivation between inter- and intragenerational conversations among strangers. Conventionality, and in particular strongly sedimented norms, appeared to be the foremost driving factor in metaphor production, both within and between generations, while the younger generation had a slight preference for weakly sedimented metaphors.
In sum, the thesis contributes to metaphor studies theoretically and methodologically and calls for better inter-study comparability through higher methodological transparency and conceptual clarity.

Department/s

Publishing year

2019

Language

English

Document type

Student publication for Master's degree (two years)

Topic

  • Languages and Literatures

Keywords

  • cognitive semiotics
  • iconicity
  • Motivation and Sedimentation Model
  • conventionality
  • embodiment
  • metaphor identification
  • signs
  • polysemy

Supervisor

  • Jordan Zlatev (Docent)