The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Post-decision consolidation and distortion of facts

På svenska

Author

Summary, in English

Participants decided whom of two patients to prioritize for surgery in three studies. The factual quantitative information about the patients (e.g., probability of surviving surgery) was given in vignette form with case descriptions on Visual Analogue Scales - VAS's. Differentiation and Consolidation theory predicts that not only the attractiveness of facts but also the mental representations of objective facts themselves will be restructured in post-decision processes in support of a decision (Svenson, 2003). After the decision, participants were asked to reproduce the objective facts about the patients. The results showed that distortions of objective facts were used to consolidate a prior decision. The consolidation process relied on facts initially favoring the non-chosen alternative and on facts rated as less, rather than more important.

Publishing year

2009

Language

English

Pages

397-407

Publication/Series

Judgment and Decision Making

Volume

4

Issue

5

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Society for Judgment and Decision Making

Topic

  • Psychology

Keywords

  • differentiation and consolidation
  • coherence
  • medical decisions
  • cognitive psychology
  • decision making

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1930-2975