The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Second order discourse: critically-informed research

Author

  • Peter Bednar
  • Christine Welch

Editor

  • Dan Remenyi

Summary, in English

Researchers who desire to bring about change in organizational settings require approaches to inquiry which can go beyond superficial appearances and prejudice. In seeking to go beyond mere examination of socio technical systems researchers have developed a proliferation of different approaches. Many of these have drawn upon social and human sciences to ground methods and assumptions in philosophical descriptions. However, critically informed researchers, in their efforts to make inquiries into organizational systems, may find it difficult to differentiate between approaches. Many approaches to inquiry are guided by philosophical foundations. There are others, however, in which philosophy is explicitly applied as part of inquiry. The authors believe that, if we aspire to include active application of philosophical domains in our efforts at critically informed research, we need a language for reflection and interpretation. In this paper, we offer a taxonomy of orders of discourse on inquiry into organizational systems as a support mechanism to overcome some of these experienced difficulties. The proposed taxonomy offers a language for differentiation.



Drawing on our experiences in developing methods for contextual analysis, the authors have recognized a need to reflect upon sense-making process, as part of analysis in practice. For us, such critically informed inquiry represents a venture in practical philosophy, drawing on hermeneutics and phenomenology. By conceptualizing a second order discourse on inquiry into systems, researchers may be enabled to move beyond limitations of socio-technical approaches and be supported in their application of philosophy. We suggest that the proposed taxonomy may provide a clue to differentiate between philosophically grounded socio-technical inquiries, and philosophical practice as an integral part of analysis.

Publishing year

2006

Language

English

Pages

61-68

Publication/Series

[Host publication title missing]

Document type

Conference paper

Publisher

Academic Conferences

Topic

  • Information Systems, Social aspects

Keywords

  • Systems analysis
  • Philosophy as practice
  • Second order discourse
  • Critically informed research

Conference name

ECRM2006: 5th European Conference on Research Method in Business and Management

Conference date

2006-06-17 - 2006-06-18

Conference place

Dublin:, Ireland

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISBN: 1-905305-26-5