The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

The effect of response style on self-reported conscientiousness across 20 countries.

På svenska

Author

  • René Mõttus
  • Jüri Allik
  • Anu Realo
  • Jérôme Rossier
  • Gregory Zecca
  • Jennifer Ah-Kion
  • Dénis Amoussou-Yéyé
  • Martin Bäckström
  • Rasa Barkauskiene
  • Oumar Barry
  • Uma Bhowon
  • Fredrik Björklund
  • Aleksandra Bochaver
  • Konstantin Bochaver
  • Gideon de Bruin
  • Helena F. Cabrera
  • Sylvia Xiaohua Chen
  • A. Timothy Church
  • Daouda Dougoumalé Cissé
  • Donatien Dahourou
  • Xiaohang Feng
  • Yanjun Guan
  • Hyi-Sung Hwang
  • Fazilah Idris
  • Marcia S. Katigbak
  • Peter Kuppens
  • Anna Kwiatkowska
  • Alfredas Laurinavicius
  • Kairul Anwar Mastor
  • David Matsumoto
  • Rainer Riemann
  • Joanna Schug
  • Brian Simpson
  • Caroline Ng Tseung-Wong
  • Wendy Johnson
Show all

Summary, in English

Rankings of countries on mean levels of self-reported Conscientiousness continue to puzzle researchers. Based on the hypothesis that cross-cultural differences in the tendency to prefer extreme response categories of ordinal rating scales over moderate categories can influence the comparability of self-reports, this study investigated possible effects of response style on the mean levels of self-reported Conscientiousness in 22 samples from 20 countries. Extreme and neutral responding were estimated based on respondents’ ratings of 30 hypothetical people described in short vignettes. In the vignette ratings, clear cross-sample differences in extreme and neutral responding emerged. These responding style differences were correlated with mean self-reported Conscientiousness scores. Correcting self-reports for extreme and neutral responding changed sample rankings of Conscientiousness, as well as the predictive validities of these rankings for external criteria. The findings suggest that the puzzling country rankings of self-reported Conscientiousness may to some extent result from differences in response styles.

Publishing year

2012

Language

English

Pages

1423-1436

Publication/Series

Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin

Volume

38

Issue

11

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Topic

  • Psychology

Keywords

  • personality
  • Conscientiousness
  • extreme responding
  • response style
  • cross-cultural

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0146-1672