The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Comparison between tower and aircraft-based eddy covariance fluxes in five European regions

Author

  • B Gioli
  • F Miglietta
  • B De Martino
  • RWA Hutjes
  • HAJ Dolman
  • Anders Lindroth
  • M Schumacher
  • MJ Sanz
  • G Manca
  • A Peressotti
  • EJ Dumas

Summary, in English

Airborne eddy covariance measurements provide a unique opportunity to directly measure surface energy, mass and momentum fluxes at the regional scale. This offers the possibility to complement the data that are obtained by the ground-based eddy covariance networks and to validate estimates of the surface fluxes that can be obtained by means of satellite products and models. The overall accuracy and the reliability of airborne eddy covariance measurements have already been assessed in the past for different platforms. More recently an international collaboration between several research laboratories and a European aeronautical manufacturer led to the development of a new small environmental research aircraft, called the Sky Arrow ERA (Environmental Research Aircraft). This aircraft has been used in the framework of the European Research Project RECAB (Regional Assessment and Modelling of the Carbon Balance in Europe), that is part of the CarboEurope projects cluster, to measure surface mass and energy exchange at five different European locations. An extensive comparison between airborne and ground-based flux data at seven flux measurement sites, showed the overall matching between airborne and tower data. While friction velocity and latent heat flux estimates made by airborne and tower data were comparable at all sites and under whatever conditions, substantial and consistent underestimation of CO2 (28% on average) and sensible heat fluxes (35% on average) was observed. Differences in the aircraft and tower footprint and flux divergence with height explained most of the discrepancies. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Publishing year

2004

Language

English

Pages

1-16

Publication/Series

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volume

127

Issue

1-2

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Physical Geography

Keywords

  • regional ecosystem
  • aircraft flux measurements
  • area-averaged fluxes
  • exchange
  • flux divergence

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1873-2240