The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Law in Progress? : A Contextual Study of Norm-Generating Processes - The Example of GMES

Author

  • Anna-Karin Bergman

Summary, in English

This PhD-thesis in Sociology of Law studies ”Law in Progress” by investigating norm-generating processes, which emerge through an interaction between actors over time. The thesis has an empirical approach, thus illustrates these processes through an empirical example, a European “Earth Observation” (EO) initiative: Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES). The main research questions dealt with are if GMES needs to be regulated and, if so, what areas need to be regulated. The thesis has produced two very interesting results: 1) the first result shows that the norm-generating processes illustrate means towards a goal. In most cases norm-generating processes give rise to a goal, whereas in this thesis the norm-generating processes instead identified the means towards the goal of implementing GMES. By identifying the means towards the goal one is able to produce a future regulation which will mirror reality to a large extent, thereby providing a valuable link between the norm-generating processes and the future regulation; 2) the second result shows the important role played by technology. The result of the study shows that GMES currently consist of two parallel norm-generating processes, which seem to be separated because of different values. One process upholds a “business perspective” which is based on economic values, while the other process upholds an “environmental management” perspective which has its foundation in research values. Both norm-generating processes have to be safeguarded in order for GMES to be implemented and legal regulations may assist in this process. A common denominator for actors adhering to the respective processes seems to be the interest in the technology (foremost Space infrastructure) and its generated information. The result of the study shows that a joint regulation of the technology and its generated data, especially of its utilisation, access (e.g. regulate who have the right to access and procedures around this issue) and data pricing (e.g. regulating pricing levels and the procedures regarding this issue), together can form one of the keys to providing a sustainable connection between the business- and the environmental management perspectives; and thereby is able to connect the two parallel norm-generating processes into a functioning system, GMES.

The thesis does not only bring about results vis-à-vis GMES, but also provide some future outlook. This outlook includes an introduction of Systems Analysis (SA) and systems dynamic (STELLA) in the investigation of norm-generating processes. With the introduction of these tools, one may be able to take the analysis of the norm-generating processes one step further and thereby provide a more dynamic image of the processes.

Publishing year

2009

Language

English

Publication/Series

Lund Studies in Sociology of Law

Volume

30

Document type

Dissertation

Publisher

Lund University

Topic

  • Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
  • Law and Society

Keywords

  • Sociology of Law
  • Law
  • Law in progress
  • GMES
  • norms
  • Norm-generating processes
  • Norm-model
  • Technology
  • Earth Observation
  • Systems analysis
  • Values
  • Environmental management
  • Business

Status

Published

Project

  • Law in Progress? A Contextual Study of Norm-Generating Processes - The Example of GMES

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1403-7246
  • ISBN: 91-7267-284-6

Defence date

3 April 2009

Defence time

13:00

Defence place

Pufendorfsalen, 1 vån. i före detta Berglingska boktryckeriets gårdsbyggnad, med ingång genom porten på Lilla Gråbrödersgatan 3 C. Lund

Opponent

  • Hanne Petersen (Professor)