+46 (0)46 222 0326
Your most visited
Theses, dissertations and research publications (including journal articles, conference abstracts and books) from Lund University are collected in this database. Where possible, the option to download a full text document is available. It is also possible to search for Lund University student theses in the student theses database.
|Title||From Meehl to fast and frugal heuristics (and back) - New insights into how to bridge the clinical-actuarial divide|
|Author/s||Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos, Thorsten Pachur, Edouard Machery, Annika Wallin|
|Full-text||Full text is not available in this archive|
|Alternative location (URL)||http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959... Restricted Access (Alternative Location)|
|Publication/Series||THEORY & PSYCHOLOGY|
|Pages||443 - 464|
|Document type||Journal article|
|Publisher||SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD|
|Abstract English||It is difficult to overestimate Paul Meehl's influence on judgment and decision-making research. His 'disturbing little book' (Meehl, 1986, p. 370) Clinical versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence (1954) is known as an attack on human judgment and a call for replacing clinicians with actuarial methods. More than 40 years later, fast and frugal heuristics - proposed as models of human judgment - were formalized, tested, and found to be surprisingly accurate, often more so than the actuarial models that Meehl advocated. We ask three questions: Do the findings of the two programs contradict each other? More generally, how are the programs conceptually connected? Is there anything they can learn from each other? After demonstrating that there need not be a contradiction, we show that both programs converge in their concern to develop (a) domain-specific models of judgment and (b) nonlinear process models that arise from the bounded nature of judgment. We then elaborate the differences between the programs and discuss how these differences can be viewed as mutually instructive: First, we show that the fast and frugal heuristic models can help bridge the clinical - actuarial divide, that is, they can be developed into actuarial methods that are both accurate and easy to implement by the unaided clinical judge. We then argue that Meehl's insistence on improving judgment makes clear the importance of examining the degree to which heuristics are used in the clinical domain and how acceptable they would be as actuarial tools.|
|Keywords||fast and frugal, heuristics, decision making, actuarial models, clinical judgment, linear models|
+46 (0)46 222 0326
Lund University's "ReSearch for the Future" magazine (Pdf, 10 Mb) presents a range of research from across the University.