The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here:

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Heterozygosity-fitness correlations within inbreeding classes: local or genome-wide effects?


Summary, in English

Marker-based studies of inbreeding may lead to

an enhanced understanding of inbreeding depression in

natural populations, which is a major concern in conservation genetics. Correlations between marker heterozygosity and variation in fitness-associated traits—‘heterozygosityfitness correlations’ (HFCs)—are of particular importance and have been widely applied in natural populations. In partially inbred populations, HFCs can be driven by selection against inbred individuals and thus reflect inbreeding depression. However, other explanations for HFCs also exist, such as functional effects of the markers per se or that the markers reveal selection on linked fitness genes due to extended linkage disequilibrium (LD) in the population. Accordingly, HFCs do not only arise in partially inbred populations, they may also occur within inbreeding classes

such as families, i.e. in situations when there is no variation in the inbreeding coefficient. In this study we focus on the importance of LDfor within-family HFCs, thereby aiming at enhancing our general understanding of HFCs. For noncoding markers, within-family HFCs have been proposed to be caused in two ways: either by ‘local effects’ at linked fitness genes in LD with the markers, or by ‘general effects’ due to a correlation between proportion of heterozygous markers (HM) and heterozygosity at genome-wide distributed fitness genes (HGW). To evaluate these contrasting hypotheses for within-family HFCs, we analysed simulated data sets of sexually reproducing populations with varying levels of LD. The results confirmed that segregation induces variation in both HM and HGW at a fixed level of inbreeding; as expected, the variation in HM declined with increasing number of markers, whereas the variation in HGW declined with decreasing LD. However, less intuitively, there was no positive correlation between the variation in HM and HGW within inbreeding classes when the local component of HGW was accounted for (i.e. when the part of the chromosome in LD with the markers was excluded). This strongly suggests that within-family HFCs are not caused by general effects. Instead, our results support the idea that HFCs at a known level of inbreeding can be driven by local effects in populations

with high to moderate LD. Note however that we define the local component of HGW as the part of the chromosomes in LDwith the markers. This implies that when LD is high, the local component will consist of a substantial part of the genome and thus provides a rather ‘genome-wide’ view. We caution against routinely interpreting positive HFCs as evidence of inbreeding depression and nonsignificant HFCs as lack thereof, especially when few markers are used.

Publishing year







Conservation Genetics





Document type

Journal article




  • Biological Sciences


  • Heterozygosity
  • Linkage
  • Inbreeding
  • Fitness
  • Recombination



Research group

  • Molecular Ecology and Evolution Lab


  • ISSN: 1566-0621