The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Validation of digital photographs, as a tool in 24-h recall, for the improvement of dietary assessment among rural populations in developing countries

Author

Summary, in English

Background
Improvement of traditional methods for dietary assessment is necessary,
especially in rural areas where it is more difficult to succeed with
self-reporting methods. This study presents and validates a method for
improving accuracy when measuring food and nutrient intake of
individuals in rural areas. It is called the “Food photography 24-h
recall method” (FP 24-hR) and is a modified 24-h recall with the
addition of a digital food photography record and a photo atlas.

Methods
The study was carried out in a rural area in the tropical region of
Bolivia; 45 women participated. Validation of the method was made by
comparing it with a reference method, the Weighed Food Record (WFR).
During the FP 24-hR, digital photographs were taken by the subjects of
all food consumed during a day and a 24-h recall questionnaire was
conducted by an interviewer. An estimate of the amount of food consumed
was made using a photo atlas and the photographs taken by the subjects.
For validation, comparison was made between the calculations, by both
methods, of the levels of food, and nutrient, intake.

Results
The comparison was made in 10 food categories; most of which were
somewhat underestimated from −2.3% (cassava) to −6.8% (rice), except for
beverages (+1.6%) and leafy vegetables (+8.7%), which were
overestimated. Spearman’s correlation coefficients were highly
significant (r from 0.75 for eggs to 0.98 for potato and
cassava). Nutrient intakes calculated with data from both methods showed
small differences from -0.90% (vitamin C) to -5.98% (fat). Although all
nutrients were somewhat underestimated, Pearsons
coefficients are high (>0.93 for all) and statistically significant.
Bland Altman analysis showed that differences between both methods were
random and did not exhibit any systematic bias over levels of food and
nutrient intake, with acceptable 95% limits of agreement.

Conclusion
The FP 24-hR exhibits acceptable differences when compared with a WFR,
digital photos are useful as a memory aid for the subjects during 24-h
recall and as an estimation tool. The method is suitable for assessing
dietary intake among rural populations in developing countries.

Department/s

  • Department of Food Technology, Engineering and Nutrition

Publishing year

2012

Language

English

Publication/Series

Nutrition Journal

Volume

11

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

BioMed Central (BMC)

Topic

  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Keywords

  • 24-h recall
  • Developing countries
  • Digital photographs
  • Photo atlas
  • Weighed record

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1475-2891