The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Glutathione transferase activity and oocyte development in copepods exposed to toxic phytoplankton

På svenska

Author

Summary, in English

Organisms present a series of cellular mechanisms to avoid the effects of toxic compounds. Such mechanisms include the increase in activity of detoxification enzymes [e.g., 7-ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) and glutathione S-transferase (GST)I, which could explain the low retention of ingested toxins generally observed in copepods. In addition, decreasing gross growth efficiency (GGE) of copepods with increasing concentration of toxic diets could be caused either by a high expenditure coping with toxins (e.g., increase in the activity of detoxification enzymes) or by a deterioration of reproductive tissues. To assess the effect of toxic phytoplankton on the activity of detoxification enzymes and on oocyte maturation of Acartia tonsa and Temora longicornis, feeding and egg production experiments were carried out with a variety of toxic diets and an adequate non-toxic food control (Rhodomonas spp.) all provided as single species diets. Toxic diets included the nodularin-producing cyanobacterium Nodularia spumigena, the dinoflagellates Alexandrium minutum, and A. tamarense, which contained Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning (PSP) toxins, the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum lima with Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning (DSP) toxins and the haptophyte Prymnesium parvum, which produces ichtyotoxins with haemolytic activity. Feeding on toxic diets was lower than on Rhodomonas spp., except for A. minutum and A. tamarense. In addition, toxic diets negatively affected reproduction in both copepod species with the production of oocytes and oocyte development impaired with A. minutum and N. spumigena. While the negative effect of N. spumigena seemed to be connected to gonad atresia likely caused by severe food limitation (starvation), the negative effect of A. minutum could have been either caused by a direct effect of saxitoxins or nutritional inadequacy on oocyte production. We could not detect EROD activity in the copepods, while the activity of GST was generally higher with the non-toxic food control and positively related to the feeding and egestion rates, suggesting relation to feeding conditions rather than to exposure to toxic diets. No relationship was found between GGE and CST activity. Our results refute the hypothesis that toxic diets, provided at ecologically relevant levels, would induce cellular mechanisms in copepods regarding GST activity. GST activity thus seems to play no role in detoxification of copepods confronted with toxic phytoplankton. Toxin detoxification and its cost for copepods still remain an open question. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Publishing year

2009

Language

English

Pages

395-406

Publication/Series

Harmful Algae

Volume

8

Issue

3

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Zoology
  • Ecology

Keywords

  • longicornis
  • Toxic phytoplankton
  • Temora
  • Oocyte development
  • Nodularia spumigena
  • S-transferase
  • Glutathione
  • Detoxification
  • Acartia tonsa
  • Alexandrium minutum

Status

Published

Research group

  • Aquatic Ecology

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1878-1470