The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Non-directivity as a therapeutic stance, and dimension of therapeutic relating

Author

  • Lars-Gunnar Lundh

Summary, in English

Abstract in Undetermined
This paper contains an analysis of the concept of nondirectivity, a discussion of some arguments against the possibility of being nondirective, and a concluding argument that nondirectivity/directivity represents a basic dimension of therapeutic relating. First, it is argued that nondirectivity should be seen as an attitude rather than a set of behaviors, and that therapeutic interventions can be either directive or nondirective. Second, three arguments against the possibility of being nondirective are discussed: the impossibility of not influencing clients, the unavoidability of biases, and clients perceiving directivity in the therapist. The suggestion is made that nondirectivity always exists in a context of directive influences, and that optimal nondirectivity requires awareness of these. Finally, it is argued that the stance of nondirectivity is more or less important to various therapists’ work, and that nondirectivity/directivity may represent a basic dimension in a potential integrative theory of psychotherapy.

Publishing year

2012

Language

English

Pages

225-239

Publication/Series

Person-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies

Volume

11

Issue

3

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Topic

  • Psychology

Keywords

  • nondirectivity
  • psychotherapy integration
  • bias
  • influence
  • empathy

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1752-9182