Argument features, clausal structure and the computation.
Author
Editor
- Eric Reuland
- Tanmoy Bhattacharya
- Giorgos Spathas
Summary, in English
This paper claims that case is vP-internally interpretable and that high NP-movement is driven by (minimally) two other ‘forces’: Person checking in a position higher than Tense, and EPP (Fin) checking in a still higher position, ‘Spec,IP’. This is evidenced by ´low’ nominatives, quirky agreement, Stylistic Fronting and expletive-distribution.
Another central claim of the paper is that grammar interprets event features in relation to speech features. In particular, Person drives NP-movement because it computes event participants (cased θ-roles) in relation to speech participants, much as Tense links event time to speech time. As evidenced by both tense interpretation and pronoun interpretation, the finite clause is a Speech Phrase, SP, containing syntactic speech features.
Another central claim of the paper is that grammar interprets event features in relation to speech features. In particular, Person drives NP-movement because it computes event participants (cased θ-roles) in relation to speech participants, much as Tense links event time to speech time. As evidenced by both tense interpretation and pronoun interpretation, the finite clause is a Speech Phrase, SP, containing syntactic speech features.
Department/s
Publishing year
2007
Language
English
Pages
121-158
Publication/Series
Argument Structure
Full text
- Available as PDF - 591 kB
- Download statistics
Document type
Book chapter
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Topic
- Languages and Literature
Status
Published
Research group
- GRIMM
ISBN/ISSN/Other
- ISBN: 978 90 272 3372