Aspects on ADM1 Implementation within the BSM2 Framework
Author
Summary, in English
The current work of developing a control simulation benchmark goes back to the work carried out within the COST
Action 682 (“Integrated Wastewater Management”) and the IAWQ Task Group on Respirometry-Based control of the
Activated Sludge Process in the late 90s. The work was continued in COST Action 624 until 2003 (Copp 2002). In
2005, the IWA Task Group on Benchmarking of Control Strategies for Wastewater Treatment Plants (BSM TG) was
initiated and is now responsible for the continued development of the benchmark work.
This report describes the development of the Lund implementation of the Anaerobic Digester Model No 1 (ADM1).
The aim of the report is to give an insight and rationale for the various changes and extensions made to the original
model as reported in Batstone et al. (2002). Since the ADM1 was developed for general modelling of anaerobic
digestion, opposed to for instance the ASM models, which were specifically developed for wastewater treatment,
Batstone et al. (2002) leave some choices to the model implementor and this report will discuss how these choices
were made in order to make this specific implementation as suitable for wastewater treatment sludge digestion as
possible. The implementation was initiated by the inclusion of the sludge treatment in the IWA benchmark simulation
model (BSM) to form a plant-wide or "within-the-fence" model.
Action 682 (“Integrated Wastewater Management”) and the IAWQ Task Group on Respirometry-Based control of the
Activated Sludge Process in the late 90s. The work was continued in COST Action 624 until 2003 (Copp 2002). In
2005, the IWA Task Group on Benchmarking of Control Strategies for Wastewater Treatment Plants (BSM TG) was
initiated and is now responsible for the continued development of the benchmark work.
This report describes the development of the Lund implementation of the Anaerobic Digester Model No 1 (ADM1).
The aim of the report is to give an insight and rationale for the various changes and extensions made to the original
model as reported in Batstone et al. (2002). Since the ADM1 was developed for general modelling of anaerobic
digestion, opposed to for instance the ASM models, which were specifically developed for wastewater treatment,
Batstone et al. (2002) leave some choices to the model implementor and this report will discuss how these choices
were made in order to make this specific implementation as suitable for wastewater treatment sludge digestion as
possible. The implementation was initiated by the inclusion of the sludge treatment in the IWA benchmark simulation
model (BSM) to form a plant-wide or "within-the-fence" model.
Department/s
Publishing year
2005
Language
English
Publication/Series
TEIE
Full text
Links
Document type
Report
Publisher
Department of Industrial Electrical Engineering and Automation, Lund Institute of Technology
Topic
- Other Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering
Status
Published
Report number
7224
ISBN/ISSN/Other
- CODEN: LUTEDX/(TEIE-7224)/1-35/(2006)