The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

A note on: an empirical comparison of forgetting models

Author

Summary, in English

In the above paper, Nembhard and Osothsilp (2001) empirically compared several forgetting models against empirical data on production breaks. Among the models compared was the learn–forget curve model (LFCM) developed by Jaber and Bonney(1996). In previous research, several studies have shown that the LFCM is advantageous to some of the models being investigated, however, Nembhard and Osothsilp (2001) found that the LFCM showed the largest deviation from empirical data. In this commentary, we demonstrate that the poor performance of the LFCM in the study of Nembhard and Osothsilp (2001) might be attributed to an error on their part when fitting the LFCM to their empirical data.

Department/s

Publishing year

2004

Language

English

Pages

233-234

Publication/Series

IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

Volume

51

Issue

2

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

IEEE - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

Topic

  • Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Keywords

  • learn–forget curve model (LFCM)
  • learning
  • forgetting
  • Comparative study
  • empirical
  • production breaks

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0018-9391