The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Tying under EC Competition Law: The Tetra Pak II Case

På svenska

Author

  • Daniel Gustafsson

Summary, in English

This paper discusses tying, a practice which, when used by large firms, has in the past been treated as anti-competitive and therefore undesirable. In the European Community, tying has been assessed in only a few court cases. The so called Tetra Pak II case was one such case. There, the court held that the defendant, Tetra Pak, was using tying in order to obtain market power by excluding its competitors. This judgment was controversial already back then and even more so today, above all in light of advancements made in economic theory on tying. These advancements have resulted in a call for a more economic, effect based approach to tying cases, rather than a form based approach. This, paired with the fact that tying has recently been tried in court, in the Microsoft case, have prompted me to go back to review the Tetra Pak II case, applying the proposed effect based approach. I have found several difficulties in doing so, but also, more interestingly, I have found that using an effect based approach in the Tetra Pak II case could, and perhaps even should, have resulted in a different outcome of the case.

Publishing year

2007

Language

English

Document type

Student publication for Bachelor's degree

Topic

  • Business and Economics

Keywords

  • Tetra Pak
  • tying
  • article 82
  • dominant position
  • competition policy
  • Economics, econometrics, economic theory, economic systems, economic policy
  • Nationalekonomi, ekonometri, ekonomisk teori, ekonomiska system, ekonomisk politik

Supervisor

  • Yves Bourdet