The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Endurance Per Se in B-time

Author

Summary, in English

Three arguments for the conclusion that objects cannot endure in B-time even if they remain intrinsically unchanged are examined: Carter and Hestevold’s enduring-objects-as-universals argument (American Philosophical Quarterly 31(4):269–283, 1994) and Barker and Dowe’s paradox 1 and paradox 2 (Analysis 63(2):106–114, 2003, Analysis 65(1):69–74, 2005). All three are shown to fail.

Publishing year

2009

Language

English

Pages

175-183

Publication/Series

Metaphysica

Volume

10

Issue

2

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Springer

Topic

  • Philosophy

Keywords

  • B-time - Endurance - Mereology - Paradox - Persistence - Universals

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1437-2053