The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Misuse of dominant position in patent enforcement

Author

Summary, in English

The Commission and the CFI stretched out in order to find that AZ abused its dominant position. It would have been interesting if the investigation had focused on whether AZ, in bad faith actually used its SPC in order to prevent competitors entry into the market. There were indications to that effect in the Commission decision, but the judgment did not discuss them. It remains to be seen whether the matter will be appealed. The lessons from Microsoft makes such an appeal more likely.

Department/s

Publishing year

2010

Language

English

Document type

Conference paper

Topic

  • Law

Keywords

  • abuse of dominance
  • fraud on the PTO
  • vexatious litigation
  • civilrätt
  • private law
  • competition law
  • konkurrensrätt

Conference name

Licensing Executive Society,

Conference date

0001-01-02

Status

Unpublished