The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Selecting antonyms for dictionary entries: methodological aspects

På svenska

Author

Summary, in English

This paper investigates the treatment of antonymy in Collins COBUILD Advanced Learner’s English Dictionary (2003) in order to find out what kinds of headwords are provided with antonyms as part of their definitions and also discusses the principles for antonym inclusion in the entries. CCALED includes canonical antonyms such as good/bad and dead/alive, as well as more contextually restricted pairings such as hot/mild and flat/fizzy. The vast majority of the antonymic pairings in the dictionary are adjectives. Most of the antonyms are morphologically different from the headwords they define and typically do not involve antonymic affixes such as non-, un- or -less. Only just over one-third of the total number of pairs is given in both directions. The principles for when antonyms are included in CCALED are not transparent to us. We propose a corpus-based method to support decisions about antonym selection and inclusion.

Publishing year

2006

Language

English

Pages

95-106

Publication/Series

Working Papers (Lund University, Department of Linguistics)

Volume

6

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Department of Linguistics, Lund University

Topic

  • General Language Studies and Linguistics
  • Languages and Literature

Keywords

  • corpus-based methods
  • antonymy
  • lexicology

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0280-526X