The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Podoplanin Is a Useful Marker for Identifying Mesothelioma in Malignant Effusions

Author

  • Atef Hanna
  • Yijun Pang
  • Carlos W. M. Bedrossian
  • Annika Dejmek
  • Claire W. Michael

Summary, in English

The diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma in serosal effusions continues to he a major challenge because some of its cytomorphological features closely resemble adenocarcinomas. Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool in the differentiation of epithelioid mesothelioma from metastatic adenocarcinomas. However, no single antibody has demonstrated absolute sensitivity or specificity. In this study, we evaluated the value of immunostaining pattern for podoplanin to differentiate mesothelioma from adenocarcinomas of various origins. Cell blocks from previously collected paraffin-embedded cell blocks of 86 effusions (18 mesothelioma, 35 reactive mesothelium, 9 breast adenocarcinoma, 14 ovarian adenocarcinoma, and 10 lung adenocarcinoma) were retrieved from the file of the Department of Pathology at University of Michigan and Lund University in Sweden and were used for the study. Slides prepared from the cell blocks were stained for podoplanin. The percentage of immunostained cells was recorded as follows: 1+ (5-25%), 2+ (26-50%), and 3+ (>50%). A stain result involving <5% of cells was considered negative. The intensity of positive results was evaluated as strong, moderate, or weak. Podoplanin is expressed in 94% of malignant mesothelioma cases (17/18), 97% (30/31) of cases of reactive mesothelial, 0% of lung adenocarcinoma cases (0/9), 0% of breast adenocarcinoma (0/9), and 7% of ovarian adenocarcinoma (1/14). All positive cases of malignant mesothelioma and reactive mesothelium showed strong membranous reactivity to podoplanin. The one positive case of ovarian adenocarcinoma showed a weak membranous-podoplanin immunostaining. On the basis of our results and published data, we believe that membranous podoplanin immunoreactivity, in conjunction with calretinin, would be more specific than CK516 and WT-1 in differentiating epithelioid malignant mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma of the lung, breast, and ovary. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2010;38:264-269. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Department/s

Publishing year

2010

Language

English

Pages

264-269

Publication/Series

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volume

38

Issue

4

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Topic

  • Cell and Molecular Biology

Keywords

  • malignant effusion
  • podoplanin
  • mesothelioma

Status

Published

Research group

  • Pathology, Malmö

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 8755-1039