The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Peas and pancakes. On apparent disagreement and (null) light verbs in Swedish

Author

Summary, in English

Two variants of what looks like disagreement between a subject and a predicative adjective are explored:



(i) Senap är gul-t.

mustard.COMMON is yellow-NEUT



‘Mustard is yellow.’



= Construction NOM(inal)



(ii) Två älskare är omoralisk-t.

[two lovers]COMMON.PL is immoral-NEUT



‘To have two lovers is immoral.’



= Construction PROP(ositional)





Having shown how Construction NOM and Construction PROP differ, I demonstrate that the subject of Construction PROP is clausal. I argue that the topmost XP of the subject phrase of both constructions contains a null neuter element. This accounts for the neuter predicative agreement; hence the idea of default agreement or semantic agreement can be dismissed. I also argue that the subject in (ii) contains a vP , the head of which is a null light verb. Other instances of null light verbs in Swedish are identified too. Finally, I propose an analysis that accounts for the close relation between Construction PROP and the corresponding construction with a med-phrase ‘with-phrase’.

Department/s

Publishing year

2009

Language

English

Pages

35-72

Publication/Series

Nordic Journal of Linguistics

Volume

32

Issue

1

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Cambridge University Press

Topic

  • Languages and Literature

Keywords

  • Ärter är gott-sentences
  • agreement
  • default gender
  • passepartouts
  • semantic agreement
  • Pannekaker er godt-sentences
  • neuter
  • med-phrase
  • disagreement
  • light verb

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0332-5865