The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Constraint-handling techniques for generative product design systems in the mass customization context

Author

Summary, in English

Generative product design systems used in the context of mass customization are required to generate diverse solutions quickly and reliably without necessitating modification or tuning during use. When such systems are employed to allow for the mass customization of product form, they must be able to handle mass production and engineering constraints that can be time-consuming to evaluate and difficult to fulfill. These issues are related to how the constraints are handled in the generative design system. This article evaluates two promising sequential constraint-handling techniques and the often used weighted sum technique with regard to convergence time, convergence rate, and diversity of the design solutions. The application used for this purpose was a design system aimed at generating a table with an advanced form: a Voronoi diagram based structure. The design problem was constrained in terms of production as well as stability, requiring a timeconsuming finite element evaluation. Regarding convergence time and rate, one of the sequential constraint-handling techniques performed significantly better than the weighted sum technique. Nevertheless, the weighted sum technique presented respectable results and therefore remains a relevant technique. Regarding diversity, none of the techniques could generate diverse solutions in a single search run. In contrast, the solutions from different searches were always diverse. Solution diversity is thus gained at the cost of more runs, but no evaluation of the diversity of the solutions is needed. This result is important, because a diversity evaluation function would otherwise have to be developed for every new type of design. Efficient handling of complex constraints is an important step toward mass customization of nontrivial product forms.

Publishing year

2013

Language

English

Pages

387-399

Publication/Series

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing

Volume

27

Issue

4

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Cambridge University Press

Topic

  • Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Keywords

  • Genetic Algorithms
  • Generative Design
  • Evolutionary Computing
  • Complex Morphologies
  • Constraint-Handling Techniques
  • Renaissance 2.0
  • Industrial design
  • Industridesign
  • Machine design
  • Maskinkonstruktion

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1469-1760