The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Argument wh-questions and implications in Swedish

Author

Editor

  • Johan Brandtler
  • David Håkansson
  • Stefan Huber
  • Eva Klingvall

Summary, in English

In this paper, I discuss the following questions:

- What kind of implication arises from an argument wh-question?

- What kind of implication arises from a clefted argument wh-question in Swedish?

- Is there any difference in Swedish between clefted and non-clefted argument wh-questions with regard to the implications of existence they give rise to?

I argue that both types of argument wh-questions in Swedish, clefted and non-clefted, give rise to the same kind of pragmatic implication and that the choice between clefted and non-clefted form does not depend on a difference in semantic content, but is, in most cases, determined by the kind of propositional attitude held by the speaker. In particular, I argue that every wh-question requires some way in which the questioner, the one asking a wh-question, is cognitively related to the truth of some proposition. Moreover, I show that clefted argument wh-questions are preferred in Swedish when the speaker holds a very strong commitment to the truth of the proposition.

Department/s

Publishing year

2012

Language

English

Pages

147-159

Publication/Series

Discourse & Grammar. A Festschrift in Honor of Valéria Molnár

Document type

Book chapter

Publisher

Lund University

Topic

  • Languages and Literature

Keywords

  • Argument wh-questions
  • Clefted argument wh-questions
  • Presupposition
  • Propositional attitudes

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISBN: 978-91-637-0411-6