The role of discourses in governing forests to combat climate change
Author
Summary, in English
Reducing emissions from forest degradation and deforestation, conserving and enhancing forest carbon stocks, and sustainably managing forests (REDD+) has emerged as one of the most anticipated climate change mitigation tools. This paper aims to understand and identify the underlying discourses that have dominated the emergence of REDD+, by identifying the key story lines in the policy and academic debates on REDD+. As such, this paper takes a step away from the “fine-tuning” of policy recommendations and instead studies REDD+ from a more theoretical approach with the intent to provide a critical analysis of the ideational structures that shape the policies that have emerged around REDD+. The analysis shows that ecological modernization and its accompanying story lines constitute a dominant notion of REDD+ as being able to manage the complexities of forest in a synergetic way, combining cost-efficient and effective mitigation with sustainable development. The paper also identifies the critical counter discourse of civic environmentalism, which criticizes this notion of REDD+ and instead promotes issues such as equity, the importance of local knowledge, and the participatory process. It argues that reducing deforestation involves trade-offs between economic, ecological, and social dimensions, also arguing that REDD+ fits overwhelmingly with the interest of the global North.
Department/s
Publishing year
2014
Language
English
Pages
265-280
Publication/Series
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
Volume
14
Issue
3
Full text
- Available as PDF - 237 kB
- Download statistics
Document type
Journal article
Publisher
Springer
Topic
- Political Science
Status
Published
Project
- Words Matter in the Woods: Discourses on Deforestation in Global Climate Politics
ISBN/ISSN/Other
- ISSN: 1573-1553