The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Infective Complications After Prostate Biopsy: Outcome of the Global Prevalence Study of Infections in Urology (GPIU) 2010 and 2011, A Prospective Multinational Multicentre Prostate Biopsy Study

Author

  • Florian M. E. Wagenlehner
  • Edgar van Oostrum
  • Peter Tenke
  • Zafer Tandogdu
  • Mete Cek
  • Magnus Grabe
  • Björn Wullt
  • Robert Pickard
  • Kurt G. Naber
  • Adrian Pilatz
  • Wolfgang Weidner
  • Truls E. Bjerklund-Johansen

Summary, in English

Background: Infection is a serious adverse effect of prostate biopsy (P-Bx), and recent reports suggest an increasing incidence. Objective: The aim of this multinational multicentre study was to evaluate prospectively the incidence of infective complications after P-Bx and identify risk factors. Design, setting, and participants: The study was performed as an adjunct to the Global Prevalence Study of Infections in Urology (GPIU) during 2010 and 2011. Men undergoing P-Bx in participating centres during the 2-wk period commencing on the GPIU study census day were eligible. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Baseline data were collected and men were questioned regarding infective complications at 2 wk following their biopsy. The Fisher exact test, Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and multivariate regression analysis were used for data analysis. Results and limitations: A total of 702 men from 84 GPIU participating centres worldwide were included. Antibiotic prophylaxis was administered prior to biopsy in 98.2% of men predominantly using a fluoroquinolone (92.5%). Outcome data were available for 521 men (74%). Symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) was seen in 27 men (5.2%), which was febrile in 18 (3.5%) and required hospitalisation in 16 (3.1%). Multivariate analysis did not identify any patient subgroups at a significantly higher risk of infection after P-Bx. Causative organisms were isolated in 10 cases (37%) with 6 resistant to fluoroquinolones. The small sample size per participating site and in compared with other studies may have limited the conclusions from our study. Conclusions: Infective complications after transrectal P-Bx are important because of the associated patient morbidity. Despite antibiotic prophylaxis, 5% of men will experience an infective complication, but none of the possible factors we examined appeared to increase this risk. Our study confirms a high incidence of fluoroquinolone resistance in causative bacteria. (C) 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Publishing year

2013

Language

English

Pages

521-527

Publication/Series

European Urology

Volume

63

Issue

3

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Urology and Nephrology

Keywords

  • Prostate biopsy
  • Infective complications
  • Urinary tract infection
  • Antibiotic resistance

Status

Published

Research group

  • Urological cancer, Malmö

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1873-7560