The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

From Speed Profile Data to Analysis of Behaviour

Author

Summary, in English

Classification of speed profiles is necessary to allow interpretation of automatic speed measurements in terms of road user behaviour. Aggregation without considering variation in individual profile shapes easily leads to aggregation bias, while classification based on exogenous criteria runs the risk of loosing important information on behavioural (co-) variation. In this paper we test how three pattern recognition techniques (cluster analysis, supervised learning and dimension reduction) can be applied to automatically classify the shapes of speed profiles of individual vehicles into interpretable types, with a minimum of a priori assumptions. The data

for the tests is obtained from an automated video analysis system and the results of automated classification are compared to the classification by a human observer done from the video. Normalisation of the speed profiles to a constant number of data points with the same spatial reference allows them to be treated as multidimensional vectors. The k-means clustering algorithm groups the vectors (profiles) based on their proximity in multidimensional space. The results are satisfactory, but still the least successful among the tested techniques. Supervised learning (nearest neighbour algorithm tested) uses a training dataset produced beforehand to assign a profile to a specific group. Manual selection of the profiles for the training dataset allows better control of the output results and the

classification results are the most successful in the tests. Dimension reduction techniques decrease the amount of data representing each profile by extracting the most typical “features”, which allows for better data visualisation and simplifies the classification procedures afterwards. The singular value decomposition (SVD) used in the test performs quite satisfactorily. The general conclusion is that pattern recognition techniques perform well in automated classification of speed profiles compared to classification by a human observer. However, there are no given rules on which technique will perform best.

Department/s

Publishing year

2009

Language

English

Pages

88-98

Publication/Series

IATSS Research

Volume

33

Issue

2

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Infrastructure Engineering
  • Mathematics

Keywords

  • Behaviour analysis
  • Pattern recognition
  • Speed profile
  • Clustering
  • Supervised learning
  • Dimension reduction

Status

Published

Research group

  • Mathematical Imaging Group

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0386-1112