The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Habitat and Habitus: Boxed-in versus Box-Breaking Research

På svenska

Author

Summary, in English

This paper argues that scholarly work is increasingly situated in narrowly circumscribed areas of study, which are encouraging specialization, incremental adding-to-the-literature contributions and a blinkered mindset. Researchers invest considerable time and energy in these specialized areas in order to maximize their productivity and career prospects. We refer to this way of doing research and structuring careers as boxed-in research. While such research is normally portrayed as a template for good scholarship, it gives rise to significant problems in management and organization studies, as it tends to generate a shortage of novel and influential ideas. We propose box-breaking research as a strategy for how researchers and institutions can move away from the prevalence of boxed-in research and, thus, be able to generate more imaginative and influential research results. We suggest three versions: box changing, box jumping and, more ambitiously, box transcendence.

Publishing year

2014

Language

English

Pages

967-987

Publication/Series

Organization Studies

Volume

35

Issue

7

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Topic

  • Business Administration

Keywords

  • box research
  • box-breaking research specialization
  • boxed-in
  • knowledge
  • production
  • social organization of science
  • theory development

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1741-3044