The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Circulating MicroRNA Expression Profiles Associated With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

På svenska

Author

  • Anting Liu Carlsen
  • Aaron J. Schetter
  • Christoffer T. Nielsen
  • Christian Lood
  • Steen Knudsen
  • Anne Voss
  • Curtis C. Harris
  • Thomas Hellmark
  • Marten Segelmark
  • Soren Jacobsen
  • Anders Bengtsson
  • Niels H. H. Heegaard
Show all

Summary, in English

Objective To evaluate the specificity of expression patterns of cell-free circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods Total RNA was purified from plasma, and 45 different specific, mature miRNAs were determined using quantitative reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction assays. A total of 409 plasma samples were obtained from 364 different patients with SLE, healthy control subjects, and control subjects with other autoimmune diseases. The results in the primary cohort of 62 patients with SLE and 29 healthy control subjects were validated in 2 independent cohorts: a validation cohort comprising 68 patients with SLE and 68 healthy control subjects, and a disease control cohort comprising 20 patients with SLE (19 of whom were from the other validation cohort), 46 healthy control subjects, 38 patients with vasculitis, 18 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and 20 immunosuppressed patients. Results Seven miRNAs were statistically significantly differentially expressed in plasma from patients with SLE. The expression of miRNA-142-3p (miR-142-3p) and miR-181a was increased, and the expression of miR-106a, miR-17, miR-20a, miR-203, and miR-92a was decreased. In addition, the expression of miR-342-3p, miR-223, and miR-20a was significantly decreased in SLE patients with active nephritis. A predictive model for SLE based on 2 or 4 miRNAs differentiated patients with SLE from control subjects (76% accuracy) when validated independently (P < 2 x 109). Use of the 4-miRNA model provided highly significant differentiation between the SLE group and disease controls, except for those with vasculitis. Conclusion Circulating miRNAs are systematically altered in SLE. A 4-miRNA signature was diagnostic of SLE, and a specific subset of miRNA profiles was associated with nephritis. All of the signature miRNAs target genes in the transforming growth factor signaling pathways. Other targets include regulation of apoptosis, cytokinecytokine receptors, T cell development, and cytoskeletal organization. These findings highlight possible dysregulated pathways in SLE and suggest that circulating miRNA patterns distinguish SLE from other immunoinflammatory phenotypes.

Publishing year

2013

Language

English

Pages

1324-1334

Publication/Series

Arthritis and Rheumatism

Volume

65

Issue

5

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Topic

  • Rheumatology and Autoimmunity

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1529-0131