The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Variations in Quality Indicators of Acute Stroke Care in 6 European Countries: The European Implementation Score (EIS) Collaboration.

På svenska

Author

  • Silke Wiedmann
  • Bo Norrving
  • Tim Nowe
  • Sònia Abilleira
  • Kjell Asplund
  • Martin Dennis
  • Peter Hermanek
  • Anthony Rudd
  • Vincent Thijs
  • Charles D A Wolfe
  • Peter U Heuschmann
Show all

Summary, in English

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Quality indicators serve as standards of care by which performance of individual hospitals is measured. Although several audits for monitoring quality of stroke care have been established in Europe, there is currently no consensus on quality indicators for acute stroke care or for methodology for collecting information on these measures. METHODS: An up-to-date inventory on European stroke audits in place in 2006 was performed in the course of a project funded by the European Union (European Implementation Score Collaboration [EIS]). Two regional (Flanders, Belgium; Catalonia, Spain) and 4 national (Germany, Scotland, Sweden, England/Wales/Northern Ireland) stroke audits took part. Between November 2009 and July 2010, 2 standardized surveys and a series of interviews were performed to determine characteristics, methods, and content of these quality initiatives. For quality purposes, all summarized information was validated by representatives of the respective audits. RESULTS: Overall, 123 quality indicators (91 process, 24 outcome, and 8 structural indicators) were identified. Anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and brain imaging were the only quality indicators used in all, whereas another 13 indicators were used in at least 2 of the quality initiatives. Substantial variations were found across the audits in terms of the development process of quality indicators, inclusion criteria, participation, population coverage, data documentation, follow-ups, benchmarking, and feedback of results to participants. CONCLUSIONS: There is a huge variety in measuring performance of acute stroke care in Europe, hampering valid comparisons of acute stroke care. Common standards for defining quality indicators and collecting information required for these measures should be defined in Europe.

Department/s

Publishing year

2012

Language

English

Pages

458-463

Publication/Series

Stroke: a journal of cerebral circulation

Volume

43

Issue

2

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

American Heart Association

Topic

  • Neurology

Keywords

  • stroke audits
  • stroke care
  • stroke registers
  • quality of health care
  • quality indicators

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1524-4628