The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

How to use indicators to measure scientific performance : A balanced approach

På svenska

Author

  • Ulrich Schmoch
  • Torben Schubert
  • Dorothea Jansen
  • Richard Heidler
  • Regina von Görtz

Summary, in English

Scientific performance should not be measured by a one-dimensional metric such as publication, since it is a multi-dimensional phenomenon. A quantitative analysis of the activities of research groups in three scientific fields demonstrates in particular the importance of sufficient numbers of PhD graduates and of contributions to the infrastructure of the scientific community, in terms of editorships or memberships of boards, etc. The results of a quantitative analysis are largely confirmed by a parallel qualitative investigation; however, both approaches complement each other by highlighting different aspects. For example, the qualitative approach conveys explicitly the demand structure for intermediary and final outputs in the qualitative approach that interlinks the activities of different research units. The results show that it is important for science policy to set appropriate incentives for all dimensions of scientific activities, i.e. not publication output exclusively, as this entails considerable hazard of distortion, endangering the sustainability of scientific research.

Publishing year

2010-03

Language

English

Pages

2-18

Publication/Series

Research Evaluation

Volume

19

Issue

1

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Topic

  • Economics and Business

Keywords

  • measurement
  • scientific growth
  • quantitative analysis

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0958-2029