The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

All-inclusive and all good: the hegemonic ambiguity of leadership

På svenska

Author

Summary, in English

This paper examines the reasons behind the popularity of leadership and leadership studies. We claim that at least part of the answer to why leadership is so celebrated and ubiquitous – in academia as well in society at large – can be found in how the term typically is (not) defined and presented. Leadership discourses are almost always persuasive; constructed to appeal and seduce audiences of the value and significance of leadership. Given their ambiguity, almost everything can be squeezed in and benefit from the aura of leadership. We propose the concept of hegemonic ambiguity to capture this and point at some basic problems associated with it, and argue for a more reflexive approach in relation to the signifier.

Publishing year

2015

Language

English

Pages

480-492

Publication/Series

Scandinavian Journal of Management

Volume

31

Issue

4

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Business Administration

Keywords

  • Leadership
  • Leadership studies
  • Followership
  • Reflexivity

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0956-5221