The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

A proposal that does not advance our understanding of hypnosis

Author

Summary, in English

In his paper Hypnosis Reconsidered, Resituated, and Redefined

(JSE 26(2):297–327), Adam Crabtree, a distinguished expert in the history of hypnosis, maintains that contemporary hypnosis research suffers from conceptual disorder. In his words, he attempts to redefi ne hypnosis in order to provide a stronger ground for future research. We find that his proposed reconsideration of hypnosis as a form of “trance” characterized by a focus

on internal stimuli and involving the recruitment of appropriate subliminal resources is neither novel nor helpful to our current understanding of hypnosis. Among the problems we find with his paper is that it is conceptually unclear and is not informed by current research and theory; for instance, it disregards well-established findings such as individual differences in responsiveness to hypnosis and the importance of suggestion for the elicitation

of hypnotic phenomena. Historical knowledge of a field is invaluable

but is alone insufficient to understand its current status or propose pathways for future research and theory.

Publishing year

2012

Language

English

Pages

329-339

Publication/Series

Journal of Scientific Exploration

Volume

26

Issue

2

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Society for Scientific Exploration

Topic

  • Psychology

Keywords

  • hypnosis
  • suggestion
  • trance

Status

Published

Research group

  • CERCAP (Center for Research on Consciousness and Anomalous Psychology)

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0892-3310