The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Horizontal and vertical targeting : a population-based comparison of public eldercare services in urban and rural areas of Sweden

På svenska

Author

  • Mårten Lagergren
  • Cecilia Fagerström
  • Britt Marie Sjölund
  • Johan Berglund
  • Laura Fratiglioni
  • Eva Nordell
  • Eva von Strauss
  • Anders Wimo
  • Sölve Elmståhl

Summary, in English

The concepts of target efficiency can be used to assess the extent to which service provision is in line with the needs of the population. Horizontaltarget efficiency denotes the extent to which those deemed to need a service receive it and vertical target efficiency is the corresponding extent to which those who receive services actually need them. The aim of this study was to assess the target efficiency of the Swedish eldercare system and to establish whether target efficiencies differ in different geographical areas such as large urban, midsize urban and rural areas. Vertical efficiency was measured by studying those people who received eldercare services and was expressed as a percentage of those who received services who were functionally dependent. To measure horizontal target efficiency, data collected at baseline in the longitudinal population study SNAC (Swedish National study on Aging and Care) during the years 2001–2004 were used. The horizontal efficiency was calculated as the percentage of functionally dependent persons who received services. Functional dependency was measured as having difficulty with instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and/or personal activities of daily living (PADL). Services included long-term municipal eldercare services (LTC). Horizontal target efficiency for the public LTC system was reasonably high in all three geographical areas, when using dependency in PADL as the measure of need (70–90 %), but efficiency was lower when the less restrictive measure of IADL dependency was used (40–50 %). In both cases, the target efficiency was markedly higher in the large urban and the rural areas than in the midsize urban areas. Vertical target efficiency showed the same pattern—it was almost 100 % in all areas for IADL dependency, but only 50–60 % for PADL dependency. Household composition differed in the areas studied as did the way public long-term care was provided to people living alone as compared to those co-habiting.

Publishing year

2016-02-01

Language

English

Pages

147-158

Publication/Series

Aging clinical and experimental research

Volume

28

Issue

1

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Kurtis

Topic

  • Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Keywords

  • Eldercare
  • Long-term care
  • Older people
  • Public care
  • Target efficiency
  • Urban/rural differences

Status

Published

Research group

  • Geriatrics
  • Geriatric Medicine

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1594-0667