The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Treating Kuhn’s Gap with Critical Contextualism. Review of William Rehg (2009). Cogent Science in Context. The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory and Habermas, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

På svenska

Author

Publishing year

2009

Language

English

Pages

149-182

Publication/Series

Cogency - Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation

Volume

1

Issue

1

Document type

Journal article review

Publisher

Universidad Diego Portales

Topic

  • Philosophy

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0718-8285