The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Differences in implementation and effects of the public procurement act in the EU construction sector

Author

Summary, in English

All member countries in the EU must follow the given directive for public procurement that has been decided upon. The purpose of the directive is to ensure a

sufficient public procurement and a sound use of public resources. However, knowledge about the implementation and effects of the directive is limited. One clear indication is that the effects vary between different countries in the EU. A preliminary study of the implementation of the public procurement act in Sweden and Denmark for the construction sector has been conducted, with the aim of obtaining knowledge of how and why implementation and effects vary. One distinction is that the number

of appeals concerning public procurement is higher in Sweden than in Denmark that might depend on a different implementation of the directive, mainly because Sweden

has added amendment to the directive while Denmark has not. The variation of implementing the directive between member countries may have negative impact upon the opportunities of obtaining the best possible service and technical solution in the public procurement process.

Department/s

  • Construction Management

Publishing year

2007

Language

English

Document type

Conference paper

Topic

  • Construction Management

Conference name

CME25 Construction Management and Economics, past, present and future

Conference date

2007-07-16 - 2077-08-18

Conference place

Reading, United Kingdom

Status

Published