The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Bratman, Searle, and Simplicity. A comment on Bratman, Shared Agency : A comment on Bratman, Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together

Author

Summary, in English

Michael Bratman’s work is established as one of the most important philosophical approaches to group agency so far, and Shared Agency, A Planning Theory of Acting Together confirms that impression. In this paper I attempt to challenge the book’s central claim that considerations of theoretical simplicity will favor Bratman’s theory of collective action over its main rivals. I do that, firstly, by questioning whether there must be a fundamental difference in kind between Searle style we-intentions and I-intentions within that type of framework. If not, Searle’s type of theory need not be less qualitatively parsimonious than Bratman’s. This hangs on how we understand the notions of modes and contents of intentional states, and the relations between modes, contents, and categorizations of such states. Secondly, by questioning whether Bratman’s theory steers clear of debunking or dismissing collectivity. Elsewhere I have claimed that the manoeuvres Bratman suggested to avoid circularity in his conceptual analysis (in 1992 and 1997) undermine the strength of his resulting notion of collective action. Bratman responds in detail to this objection in his new book and I return to the issue towards the end of the paper.

Department/s

Publishing year

2015

Language

English

Pages

27-37

Publication/Series

Journal of Social Ontology

Volume

1

Issue

1

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

De Gruyter

Topic

  • Philosophy

Keywords

  • Bratman
  • Collective action

Status

Published

Project

  • Agency; Collective and Individual Perspectives
  • Avsiktlighet och agentperspektiv
  • Metaphysics and Collectivity

Research group

  • Metaphysics and Collectivity

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 2196-9655