The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

The Struggle for History: Lindsay Anderson Teaches Free Cinema

Author

Summary, in English

In spring 1986, Lindsay Anderson appeared in a television programme

on British cinema. This was part of a series of three under the heading

British Cinema: Personal View, produced by Thames Television. Anderson’s

contribution, Free Cinema 1956–? An Essay on Film by Lindsay Anderson, was

written and directed by him. He was also the star of the programme, providing a

lecture on the history of British cinema with himself at the very core, although,

at the time of the production, Anderson’s career was in decline and he was

not involved in any film projects. Drawing on press materials, the programme

itself and Anderson’s personal papers in the University of Stirling library, this

article analyses Anderson’s personal conception of Free Cinema – according to

his understanding, a short-lived documentary movement in the 1950s which

eventually transformed itself into a series of feature films in the ensuing

decades, particularly his own trilogy If. . . . (1968), O Lucky Man! (1973) and

Britannia Hospital (1982). The polemic in the programme was particularly

aimed at the general idea of the British Film Year of 1985 and at the successful

film producer David Puttnam, at the time well known for his contribution to

what was sometimes called the ‘New British Cinema’ of the 1980s. Anderson,

however, dismissed Puttnam as a film-maker concerned only with Oscars

and economic success, and instead lauded the qualities of ‘Free Cinema’, a

realist, non-conformist and radical aesthetic, as the most artistically rewarding

tradition in British cinema. The programme was highly entertaining and was

generally well received by the British press, but did not really strengthen

Anderson’s position within the British film industry, which might, or might not,

have been Anderson’s intention.

Department/s

Publishing year

2014

Language

English

Pages

312-331

Publication/Series

Journal of British Cinema and Television

Volume

11

Issue

2-3

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Edinburgh University Press

Topic

  • Arts

Keywords

  • Lindsay Anderson
  • Free Cinema
  • British Film Year
  • Thames Television
  • David Puttnam

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1743-4521