The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

What a corpus-based dictionary tells us about antonymy

Author

Editor

  • E. Corino
  • C. Maraello
  • C. Onesti

Summary, in English

This paper investigates the treatment of antonymy in Collins COBUILD Advanced Learner’s

English Dictionary (2003) in order to find out what kinds of headwords are provided with antonyms

as part of their definitions and also discusses the principles for antonym inclusion in the entries.

CCALED includes canonical antonyms such as good/bad and dead/alive, as well as more

contextually restricted pairings such as hot/mild and flat/fizzy. The vast majority of the antonymic

pairings in the dictionary are adjectives. Most of the antonyms are morphologically different from

the headwords they define and typically do not involve antonymic affixes such as non-, un- or -less.

Only just over one-third of the total number of pairs are given in both directions. The principles for

when antonyms are included in CCALED are not transparent to us.

Publishing year

2006

Language

English

Pages

213-220

Publication/Series

Proceedings XII EURALEX International Congress

Document type

Conference paper

Topic

  • Languages and Literature
  • General Language Studies and Linguistics

Keywords

  • corpus-based methods
  • antonymy
  • lexicology

Conference name

EURALEX

Conference date

0001-01-02

Status

Published