The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Limitations of Transitional Justice in the PRC: the Curious Absence of the inoffizielle Mitarbeiter

På svenska

Author

Summary, in English

My paper begins with some brief observations on the existing literature on the Chinese Communist Party’s post-Mao reversal of so-called unjust, wrong, and false cases. The paper then proceeds to examine a noteworthy difference between the PRC case and transitional justice in other states where “the transitional” entailed a further shift in power from an ancien regime to an entirely new order (viz. Eastern Europe after 1989): the complete absence from the Chinese public record of the inoffizielle Mitarbeiter (teqing in Chinese). Drawing on Chinese Public Security files, I argue that his/her absence from accounts of injustices and justice should not be interpreted as evidence of the teqing not actually having been present in Mao Zedong’s socio-political reality. Public Security organs had, in many of the categories of cases reviewed in the post-Mao transitional justice system, regulalry and routinely employed the operational instrument of the teqing to obtain (fabricate?) evidence and secure (false?) convictions.

Department/s

Publishing year

2013

Language

English

Document type

Conference paper

Topic

  • History and Archaeology

Keywords

  • China
  • law
  • justice
  • Cultural Revolution
  • informers
  • inoffizielle Mitarbeiter

Conference name

Justice and Accountability in Maoist China and After

Conference date

2013-03-08

Conference place

München, Germany

Status

Unpublished