The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Reasoning by Analogy - A Study on Analogy-Based Arguments in Law

På svenska

Author

  • David Reidhav

Summary, in English

This doctoral dissertation is a study on analogy-based arguments in law. Its overarching aim is to clarify reasoning by analogy in law. A model is proposed for analyzing and assessing arguments from analogy in law. The dissertation shows how analogy-based arguments in law proceed, what form they can be given and separates different steps involved in assessing whether such arguments establish the acceptability of their conclusions. It also structures the comparison of cases with respect to dimensional properties of which cases may have more or less. What reason can be given for preferring different ways of arguing from analogy in law is examined. Other central issues dealt with in the dissertation are: the relation of reasoning by analogy to past mistakes, whether arguments from analogy must be rule-based in order to be compelling, different uses of arguments from analogy in law, and the role of formal justice in normative discourse. Cases from several legal systems and areas of law exemplify reasoning by analogy, showing that this type of reasoning is not unique to a particular legal system or a particular field of law. Even though the dissertation focuses on reasoning by analogy within a legal context, much said in the dissertation of analogy-based arguments is not limited to a legal context and may thus be useful for other fields than law.

Department/s

Publishing year

2007

Language

English

Document type

Dissertation

Publisher

Faculty of Law, Lund university

Topic

  • Law

Keywords

  • Reasoning by analogy
  • legal argumentation
  • legal methodology
  • formal justice
  • stare decisis
  • precedent
  • analogy
  • proportional analogy
  • similarity
  • dimensional property
  • comparative similarity
  • arguments from analogy
  • closure rule
  • jurisprudence
  • allmän rättslära

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISBN: 978-91-628-7172-7

Defence date

24 May 2007

Defence time

10:15

Defence place

Pufendorfsalen, Lilla Gråbrödersgatan 3 c, Tryckeriet, Juridicum, Lund.

Opponent

  • José Juan Moreso (Professor)